✍️ 機械翻訳の時代に外国語を学ぶ意味

あなたは大学入試の要約問題の採点者です。次の【英文】を120字以内の日本語で要約した【私の答案】を、100点満点で採点してください。

配点：内容（要点）50点／構成と論理20点／表現20点／字数と形式10点

次の順番で、やさしい日本語で答えてください。
1. 各観点の得点と、その理由
2. 減点された箇所の具体的な指摘（該当部分を引用して）
3. 直した例（1つだけ）
4. 次に直すべき点を3つ

採点の注意：原文の言い回しの丸写しは減点。具体例や数字を入れすぎていたら減点。自分の意見が混ざっていたら減点。字数は制限の90〜100%が理想。

【制限字数】120

【英文】
Machine translation has become so good that many people now ask a simple question: why should we spend years learning a foreign language? A phone can turn a menu, a letter, or even a spoken sentence into another language in a moment. It seems reasonable to conclude that language study is becoming a waste of time.

However, this conclusion misses something important. Translation tools are good at moving information from one language to another, but communication is more than the exchange of information. When we speak with someone in their own language, we show that we are willing to make an effort for them. This effort often builds trust, and trust is what turns a brief exchange into a relationship. A perfect sentence produced by a machine rarely creates the same feeling.

Learning a language also changes the learner. Every language divides the world in its own way. Some languages have a single word for a feeling that others need a whole sentence to explain, and some require speakers to mark politeness in every sentence. Learners who notice these differences begin to see that their own language is only one way of organizing experience. This awareness makes them more flexible thinkers, and it helps them understand people who see things differently.

Of course, no one should deny the usefulness of translation tools. For travelers, and for people who need to read a document quickly, they are a great help. But depending on them entirely has a cost. Users who never struggle with a language never develop a feel for its rhythm and humor, and they cannot judge whether the machine's answer is truly right.

In short, technology has changed how we use languages, but it has not removed the reasons to learn them. The best approach is to treat machines as partners, not substitutes, while continuing to build our own ability to listen, speak, and understand.

【私の答案】
（ここに自分の要約を貼る）

You are a strict but kind grader for university entrance exam summary tasks. Grade my summary of the passage below out of 100 points.

Scoring: Content (key points) 50 / Structure and logic 20 / Language (grammar, vocabulary, paraphrasing) 20 / Length and format 10.

Please answer in Japanese in this order:
1. Score for each category with reasons
2. Specific problems (quote the words in my summary)
3. One improved version of my summary
4. Three things to fix next time

Rules: copying whole sentences from the passage loses points. Use third-person, present tense. The ideal length is 90–110% of the target.

Target length: about 50 words

Passage:
Machine translation has become so good that many people now ask a simple question: why should we spend years learning a foreign language? A phone can turn a menu, a letter, or even a spoken sentence into another language in a moment. It seems reasonable to conclude that language study is becoming a waste of time.

However, this conclusion misses something important. Translation tools are good at moving information from one language to another, but communication is more than the exchange of information. When we speak with someone in their own language, we show that we are willing to make an effort for them. This effort often builds trust, and trust is what turns a brief exchange into a relationship. A perfect sentence produced by a machine rarely creates the same feeling.

Learning a language also changes the learner. Every language divides the world in its own way. Some languages have a single word for a feeling that others need a whole sentence to explain, and some require speakers to mark politeness in every sentence. Learners who notice these differences begin to see that their own language is only one way of organizing experience. This awareness makes them more flexible thinkers, and it helps them understand people who see things differently.

Of course, no one should deny the usefulness of translation tools. For travelers, and for people who need to read a document quickly, they are a great help. But depending on them entirely has a cost. Users who never struggle with a language never develop a feel for its rhythm and humor, and they cannot judge whether the machine's answer is truly right.

In short, technology has changed how we use languages, but it has not removed the reasons to learn them. The best approach is to treat machines as partners, not substitutes, while continuing to build our own ability to listen, speak, and understand.

My summary:
(paste your summary here)