英検1級 二次 予想トピック 96 ・ 📱 メディア・SNS・情報 ・ Agree or disagree
Agree or disagree: Social media algorithms are making society more divided
賛成か反対か:SNSのアルゴリズムが社会の分断を深めている
SNSのおすすめ表示や「エコーチェンバー」を実感したことがあり、選挙の話題とも結びつけられる人向け。
骨組み理由3つ(どちらの立場でも話せる)
賛成(Yes)で話すなら
I agree that social media algorithms are making society more divided.
- echo chambersAlgorithms show us content similar to what we already like. Over time, people see mainly opinions they agree with and rarely encounter different views.
- anger spreadsPosts that make people angry tend to get more clicks and shares, so algorithms often promote them. This rewards extreme opinions over calm discussion.
- shared factsWhen each person sees a different news feed, society loses a common set of facts. It becomes hard to discuss problems when people cannot even agree on what is true.
反対(No)で話すなら
I disagree. Algorithms may play a role, but they are not the main cause of division.
- older divisionsPolitical and social divisions existed long before social media. Economic inequality and changes in society are deeper causes.
- personal choicePeople choose whom to follow and what to click on. Even without algorithms, many people would still prefer news that matches their beliefs.
- diverse exposureSocial media can actually expose people to more viewpoints than traditional media. Many users come across opinions from other countries and generations that they would never have heard otherwise.
想定質疑面接委員はこう突っ込んでくる
QShould governments regulate social media algorithms?
I think some regulation is needed, especially to make algorithms more transparent. For example, users should be able to know why a post is shown to them and choose a feed that is not personalized. The EU already requires large platforms to offer such options.
Q:政府はSNSのアルゴリズムを規制すべきですか。
A:特にアルゴリズムの透明性を高めるために、ある程度の規制は必要だと思います。例えば、ある投稿がなぜ自分に表示されるのかを知ることができ、個人向けに最適化されていない表示も選べるようにすべきです。EUはすでに、大手のプラットフォームにそうした選択肢を用意するよう義務づけています。
QWhat can individuals do to avoid echo chambers?
I think we can deliberately follow people with different views and check several news sources. Before sharing something that makes us angry, we can stop and ask whether it is true. Small habits like these can make a big difference.
Q:エコーチェンバーに陥らないために、個人には何ができますか。
A:あえて違う意見の人をフォローしたり、いくつかのニュース源を確かめたりできると思います。腹の立つ投稿をシェアする前に、立ち止まって本当かどうかを考えることもできます。こうした小さな習慣が大きな違いを生みます。
QHas social media affected elections in Japan?
I think it has become much more influential in recent years. Some candidates have gained huge support through short videos on social media, which shows that it can reach voters whom traditional media do not. However, it can also spread misleading information very quickly.
Q:SNSは日本の選挙に影響を与えていますか。
A:ここ数年で影響力がずっと大きくなったと思います。SNSの短い動画で大きな支持を集めた候補者もいて、従来のメディアが届かない有権者にも届くことを示しています。しかし、誤解を招く情報をあっという間に広めてしまうこともあります。
語彙このトピックで使える表現
- algorithmアルゴリズム
- echo chamberエコーチェンバー(同じ意見ばかりが響き合う空間)
- filter bubbleフィルターバブル
- polarization(意見の)二極化、分断
- engagement(いいね・シェアなどの)反応