原田英語の英検二次面接 ぜんぶ攻略くん
AI採点

英検1級 二次 予想トピック 9 ・ 🤖 テクノロジー・AI ・ Agree or disagree

Agree or disagree: Generative AI will do more good than harm to creative industries

賛成か反対か：生成AIは創作の産業に、害よりも益を多くもたらす

このトピックを選ぶべき人

絵・音楽・文章などの創作が好きで、AIツールを使った経験を話せる人向け。

骨組み理由3つ（どちらの立場でも話せる）

賛成（Yes）で話すなら

I agree, because generative AI can make creative work more accessible and free creators from routine tasks.

  1. lower barriersPeople without expensive equipment or professional training can now create music, illustrations, and videos. This allows many new voices to be heard.
  2. productivityAI can handle time-consuming tasks such as drawing backgrounds, editing, and translation. Animation studios, for example, could spend more time on storytelling and character design.
  3. new forms of artThroughout history, new technologies such as photography and digital music have created new art forms. AI is likely to do the same by inspiring new styles and ways of working.

反対（No）で話すなら

I disagree, because generative AI threatens creators' jobs and uses their work without permission.

  1. copyrightMany AI models were trained on huge numbers of artworks and texts without the creators' consent. Several artists and news organizations have taken AI companies to court over this issue.
  2. lost incomeCompanies may choose cheap AI-generated images instead of paying illustrators or voice actors. In fact, many freelance creators say that their work has already decreased.
  3. flood of low-quality contentThe internet is being filled with mass-produced AI content. This makes it harder for original works to be noticed.

想定質疑面接委員はこう突っ込んでくる

QWhat about artists who are losing work because of AI?

That's a serious issue, and I don't want to ignore it. Some types of routine work, such as simple illustrations, may certainly decrease. However, creators who learn to use AI as a tool can work faster and take on bigger projects. So I think support for retraining is important, but overall the industry will grow.

Q：AIのせいで仕事を失っているアーティストはどうなるのですか。
A：深刻な問題で、無視するつもりはありません。簡単なイラストのような定型的な仕事は、確かに減るかもしれません。しかし、AIを道具として使いこなすクリエイターは、より速く働き、より大きな仕事を引き受けられます。ですから、学び直しの支援は大切ですが、全体としては産業は成長すると思います。

QShould AI companies pay creators whose works were used for training?

Yes, I think they should. Using someone's work without permission or payment is unfair, even if it is only for training a machine. A licensing system, like the one used for music, could be a practical solution.

Q：AI企業は、学習に作品を使われたクリエイターにお金を払うべきですか。
A：はい、払うべきだと思います。たとえ機械の学習のためだけでも、人の作品を許可も対価もなく使うのは不公平です。音楽で使われているような使用許諾の仕組みが、現実的な解決策になりえます。

QCan AI-generated works ever be called art?

I think it depends on how much human creativity is involved. If a person simply types a few words, it may be hard to call the result art. But when an artist uses AI as one tool among many and makes careful choices, I believe the final work can be art.

Q：AIが生成した作品を芸術と呼べることはあるのでしょうか。
A：人間の創造性がどれだけ関わっているかによると思います。数語を入力しただけなら、その結果を芸術と呼ぶのは難しいかもしれません。でも、アーティストがAIを多くの道具の1つとして使い、注意深く選択を重ねたなら、完成した作品は芸術になりうると考えます。

語彙このトピックで使える表現