原田英語の英検二次面接 ぜんぶ攻略くん
AI採点

英検1級 二次 予想トピック 8 ・ 🤖 テクノロジー・AI ・ Can ~?

Can laws effectively stop the harm caused by deepfakes?

法律でディープフェイクによる被害を効果的に止められるか。

このトピックを選ぶべき人

法律・規制と技術の追いかけっこを、両面から話せる人向け。

骨組み理由3つ（どちらの立場でも話せる）

賛成（Yes）で話すなら

I believe laws can effectively reduce the harm caused by deepfakes, as long as they are clear and strictly enforced.

  1. deterrenceStrict penalties make people think twice before creating harmful fake content. Several countries have introduced laws that punish the creation or sharing of fake sexual images, for example.
  2. duties for platformsLaws can require social media companies to remove deepfakes quickly once they are reported. Because platforms control how content spreads, this can greatly limit the damage.
  3. support for victimsLaws give victims a clear way to demand the removal of content and to seek compensation. Without legal rules, victims often have nowhere to turn.

反対（No）で話すなら

I don't think laws alone can effectively stop deepfakes, because the technology spreads faster than legal systems can respond.

  1. anonymityMany deepfakes are created anonymously and shared across borders. Even if one country has strict laws, it is very difficult to find and punish the creators.
  2. speedOnce a fake video goes viral, millions of people may see it within hours. By the time a court acts, the damage to someone's reputation has already been done.
  3. easy toolsFree AI tools now allow almost anyone to create convincing fakes in minutes. It would be impossible to monitor every user.

想定質疑面接委員はこう突っ込んでくる

QHow can a law work if the creator is in another country?

That's a real challenge. Admittedly, a single country cannot catch everyone. However, it can require platforms operating in the country to remove harmful content quickly, wherever the creator is. International cooperation, like the kind we see in fighting cybercrime, can also help.

Q：作った人が外国にいたら、法律はどう機能するのですか。
A：そこは本当に難しい点です。確かに、1つの国だけで全員を捕まえることはできません。しかし、その国で事業をするプラットフォームに対しては、作った人がどこにいても、有害なコンテンツを素早く削除するよう義務づけられます。サイバー犯罪対策に見られるような国際協力も役に立ちます。

QWouldn't strict laws limit freedom of expression, such as satire?

I understand that concern. However, the law should target content that causes clear harm, such as fraud or fake sexual images, not obvious parody. As long as the definition is narrow and clear, freedom of expression can be protected.

Q：厳しい法律は、風刺のような表現の自由を制限しませんか。
A：その懸念は分かります。しかし、法律が対象にすべきなのは、詐欺や偽の性的画像のように明らかな害を生むもので、パロディだと分かるものではありません。定義を狭く明確にすれば、表現の自由は守れます。

QBesides laws, what can be done to fight deepfakes?

Technology and education are also important. Detection tools can help identify fake videos, and digital watermarks can show where content came from. At the same time, schools should teach students to check sources before believing or sharing something.

Q：法律以外に、ディープフェイクと闘うために何ができますか。
A：技術と教育も大切です。検出ツールは偽動画の見分けに役立ちますし、電子透かしはコンテンツの出どころを示せます。同時に、学校では、何かを信じたり共有したりする前に出どころを確かめるよう教えるべきです。

語彙このトピックで使える表現