英検1級 二次 予想トピック 12 ・ 🤖 テクノロジー・AI ・ Is ~ worth ~?
Are fully self-driving cars worth the risks?
完全自動運転車は、そのリスクを冒すだけの価値があるか。
地方の交通や高齢ドライバーの問題と結びつけて話せる人向け。
骨組み理由3つ(どちらの立場でも話せる)
賛成(Yes)で話すなら
I believe self-driving cars are worth the risks, because they could save many lives and give people more freedom to travel.
- human errorMost traffic accidents are caused by human mistakes such as speeding, drunk driving, or looking at a phone. Self-driving cars never get tired or distracted.
- mobility for the elderlyIn rural Japan, many older people depend on cars because buses and trains are infrequent. Self-driving vehicles would allow them to stay independent after giving up their licenses.
- driver shortageThere is a serious shortage of bus and truck drivers in Japan. Self-driving technology could keep local bus services and deliveries running.
反対(No)で話すなら
I don't think fully self-driving cars are worth the risks yet, because the technology is not ready for every situation.
- unpredictable situationsSelf-driving systems still struggle with heavy snow, road construction, and unexpected behavior by pedestrians. There have been serious accidents involving test vehicles overseas.
- responsibilityWhen a self-driving car causes an accident, it is unclear whether the owner, the carmaker, or the software company is to blame. Our laws are not ready for this question.
- hackingCars connected to the internet could be hacked. A single attack could affect thousands of vehicles at the same time.
想定質疑面接委員はこう突っ込んでくる
QWould you feel safe riding in a car with no driver?
I would probably feel nervous the first time. However, people felt the same way about airplanes and elevators in the past. If the technology is tested carefully and proves to be safer than human drivers, I think most people would get used to it.
Q:運転手のいない車に乗って、安心できますか。
A:最初はたぶん緊張すると思います。でも、昔の人は飛行機やエレベーターにも同じように感じていました。技術が慎重に試され、人間の運転より安全だと証明されれば、ほとんどの人は慣れていくと思います。
QWho should be responsible if a self-driving car causes an accident?
I think the manufacturer should take the main responsibility, because the car is controlled by its software. Of course, owners should also be responsible for maintenance and updates. Clear laws on this point are necessary before the technology spreads.
Q:自動運転車が事故を起こしたら、誰が責任を負うべきですか。
A:車はソフトウェアで制御されているので、主な責任はメーカーが負うべきだと思います。もちろん、所有者にも整備や更新の責任はあります。技術が広まる前に、この点について明確な法律が必要です。
QShould self-driving cars be introduced first in cities or in rural areas?
I would start with specific routes in rural areas, where traffic is lighter and the need is greater. In fact, some Japanese towns are already testing self-driving buses on fixed routes. Once the system proves safe there, it could gradually expand to busier cities.
Q:自動運転車は、都市と地方のどちらで先に導入すべきですか。
A:交通量が少なく必要性も高い、地方の決まったルートから始めます。実際、日本の一部の町ではすでに、決まったルートで自動運転バスの実験をしています。そこで安全性が証明されたら、少しずつ混雑した都市へ広げればよいと思います。
語彙このトピックで使える表現
- autonomous vehicle自動運転車
- human error人為的ミス
- give up one's driver's license運転免許を返納する
- liability法的責任
- fixed route決まったルート