CHECK TEST

英検1級 リーディング超絶チートシート(大問別の解き方・時間配分)確認問題集

英検1級リーディングの確認問題25問。語彙・長文の空所・内容一致と、1語で反転する読みを試す。

正解 0 / 25

Ⅰ【大問1型】空所に入る最も適切なものを選べ(1問27秒が目安)

  1. 1
    After the scandal broke, the CEO issued a public apology in an attempt to angry shareholders.
  2. 2
    The once-thriving fishing town is now , with most young people having left to find work in the cities.
  3. 3
    The new DNA evidence the man, who had spent ten years in prison for a crime he did not commit.
  4. 4
    The professor has a appetite for knowledge; she reads several books a week on subjects ranging from astronomy to zoology.
  5. 5
    The minister gave an answer when asked whether taxes would rise, leaving reporters unsure of what she really meant.
  6. 6
    Investigators found that the company had used a legal loophole to environmental regulations.
  7. 7
    Although he was as a boy, often getting into fights at school, he grew into a calm and gentle man.
  8. 8
    The witness's account was so full of contradictions that the jury began to doubt its .
  9. 9
    The author's argument is ; she supports every claim with carefully documented evidence.
  10. 10
    When the factory closed, many families could only a living by taking part-time jobs.
  11. 11
    The government stepped in with emergency loans to the struggling airline.
  12. 12
    In his speech, the mayor the city's budget problems, focusing instead on its new parks and festivals.
  13. 13
    The movement began with great enthusiasm, but support for it gradually after its leader resigned.

Ⅱ【大問2型】英文を読み、( 1 )〜( 3 )に入る最も適切なものを選べ

Honest Placebos / For decades, doctors assumed that a placebo—a pill containing no active ingredients—could work only if patients were deceived. The logic seemed simple: if people knew their pill was fake, they would not expect it to help, and without that expectation, no improvement would occur. For this reason, placebos were largely confined to clinical trials, where they served as a standard against which new drugs could be compared. Using them in everyday treatment, on the other hand, was regarded as ( 1 ), since it would require doctors to mislead their patients. / In recent years, however, a number of studies have challenged this assumption. In these experiments, patients with long-term conditions such as back pain were given pills and told plainly that the pills contained no medicine at all. Surprisingly, many of these patients reported feeling better than those who received no treatment. Such findings suggest that ( 2 ). / Researchers are still debating why honest placebos have any effect. One explanation is that the ritual of treatment itself—visiting a doctor, receiving a prescription, and taking pills at regular times—may trigger the body's own pain-relief responses. ( 3 ), critics caution that most of these studies have been small and that improvements reported by patients themselves may partly reflect a desire to please researchers. Until larger trials are conducted, the jury is still out on how widely the approach should be used.

本文の訳を見る

正直なプラセボ
何十年もの間、医師たちは、プラセボ(有効成分を含まない薬)は患者がだまされているときにしか効かないと考えていた。理屈は単純に思えた。薬が偽物だと知っていれば人は効くと期待しないし、その期待がなければ改善も起こらない、というわけだ。そのためプラセボは主に臨床試験に限られ、新薬と比べるための基準として使われてきた。一方、日常の治療に使うことは倫理的に許されないと見なされていた。医師が患者を欺く必要があるからだ。
ところが近年、この前提に疑問を投げかける研究がいくつも出てきた。これらの実験では、腰痛など長く続く症状を持つ患者に錠剤を渡し、その錠剤には薬がまったく入っていないとはっきり伝えた。驚いたことに、こうした患者の多くは、治療を受けなかった患者よりも具合がよくなったと答えたのだ。この結果は、プラセボが効くのに欺くことは必要ないかもしれないことを示している。
正直なプラセボがなぜ効くのかについては、研究者の間でまだ議論が続いている。1つの説明は、治療という儀式そのもの、つまり医者にかかり、処方を受け、決まった時間に錠剤を飲むことが、体にもともと備わった痛みを和らげる反応を引き起こすのかもしれない、というものだ。とはいえ、批判する人々は、こうした研究の多くは小規模で、患者自身が報告する改善には、研究者を喜ばせたいという気持ちが一部反映されているかもしれないと注意を促している。より大規模な試験が行われるまでは、この方法をどこまで広く使うべきかは、まだ結論が出ていない。

  1. 14
    ( 1 )
  2. 15
    ( 2 )
  3. 16
    ( 3 )

Ⅲ【大問3型】英文を読み、質問の答えとして最も適切なものを選べ

Rethinking the "Dark Ages" / [1] For centuries, the period that followed the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the fifth century was commonly referred to as the "Dark Ages." The idea, which can be traced back to some Renaissance writers, reflected a belief that classical learning had all but vanished from Europe and that society had sunk into ignorance until its revival roughly a thousand years later. Conventional wisdom held that little of cultural value had been produced in the intervening centuries. / [2] Over the past century, however, historians have increasingly challenged this view. They point out that monasteries across Europe copied and preserved large numbers of ancient texts, many of which would otherwise have been lost. In the late eighth and early ninth centuries, the court of Charlemagne actively promoted education and the copying of manuscripts, an effort that some scholars describe as a renaissance in its own right. Moreover, far from being isolated, early medieval Europe was linked by trade to the Islamic world, where scholars were translating and building on Greek works in mathematics, medicine, and astronomy. / [3] The reassessment is not without its critics. Some archaeologists argue that in parts of Western Europe, the material evidence points to a genuine and severe decline after Roman rule ended: towns shrank, the production of high-quality pottery fell sharply, and long-distance trade appears to have decreased. In their view, emphasizing the achievements of a small educated elite risks obscuring the hardships faced by ordinary people. / [4] Most historians today avoid the term "Dark Ages," preferring the more neutral "early Middle Ages." Yet the debate has not simply replaced one story with another. Instead, it has encouraged scholars to ask whose experience a label describes. A period may have been one of decline for city dwellers in one region and of intellectual vitality for monks in another.

本文の訳を見る

「暗黒時代」を考え直す
[1] 何世紀もの間、5世紀に西ローマ帝国が崩壊した後の時代は、一般に「暗黒時代」と呼ばれてきた。この考え方は一部のルネサンス期の書き手にまでさかのぼることができ、古典の学問がヨーロッパからほぼ消え去り、およそ1000年後に復興するまで社会は無知に沈んでいた、という見方を反映していた。その間の数世紀には文化的価値のあるものはほとんど生み出されなかった、というのが通説だった。
[2] しかし過去100年ほどの間に、歴史家たちはこの見方にますます異を唱えるようになった。彼らは、ヨーロッパ各地の修道院が大量の古代の文献を書き写して保存し、そうでなければその多くは失われていただろう、と指摘する。8世紀後半から9世紀前半には、カール大帝の宮廷が教育と写本作りを積極的に奨励し、一部の学者はこの取り組みをそれ自体1つのルネサンスだと評している。さらに、初期中世のヨーロッパは孤立していたどころか、交易によってイスラム世界とつながっていた。イスラム世界では、学者たちが数学・医学・天文学のギリシャの著作を翻訳し、それを発展させていた。
[3] この見直しにも批判がないわけではない。一部の考古学者は、西ヨーロッパの一部の地域では、ローマの支配が終わった後に本当に深刻な衰退があったことを物的証拠が示していると主張する。町は縮小し、質の高い陶器の生産は急減し、遠距離の交易も減ったようだ。彼らの見方では、少数の教養あるエリートの業績を強調すると、普通の人々が直面した苦難が見えなくなるおそれがある。
[4] 今日、ほとんどの歴史家は「暗黒時代」という語を避け、より中立的な「初期中世」を好んで使う。しかし、この論争は単に1つの物語を別の物語に置き換えただけではない。むしろ、ある呼び名が「誰の経験」を表しているのかを問うよう、学者たちを促したのだ。ある時代は、ある地域の都市住民にとっては衰退の時代であり、別の地域の修道士にとっては知的活力の時代だったかもしれない。

  1. 17
    According to the passage, the term "Dark Ages" originally reflected the belief that
  2. 18
    What is one reason historians have challenged the traditional view?
  3. 19
    The archaeologists mentioned in the third paragraph believe that
  4. 20
    What can be inferred about the author's view of the debate?

Ⅳ 英文と同じ内容を表すものを選べ(否定・限定の1語に注意)

  1. 21
    The drug's long-term safety has yet to be established.
  2. 22
    Only after the bridge collapsed did the city begin inspecting its other bridges.
  3. 23
    Far from reducing traffic, the new road attracted even more cars to the area.
  4. 24
    The policy was not so much a failure as a missed opportunity.
  5. 25
    The proposal was met with skepticism by many economists.
まちがえた所は、シートで確認。

英検1級 リーディング超絶チートシート(大問別の解き方・時間配分)(A4 3枚)

シートへ戻る