原田英語の英検二次面接 ぜんぶ攻略くん
AI採点

英検1級 二次 予想トピック 79 ・ 💼 働き方・経済 ・ To what extent

To what extent should companies be able to transfer employees to other cities without their consent?

会社は、社員の同意なしに、どの程度まで他の都市へ転勤させてよいか。

このトピックを選ぶべき人

共働きの家庭や転勤の多い家族など、転勤で生活が変わる身近な例を話せる人向け。

骨組み理由3つ（どちらの立場でも話せる）

賛成（Yes）で話すなら

I believe companies should have this power to a considerable extent, because transfers are important for both business and career growth.

  1. business needsCompanies with branches across the country need to send experienced staff where they are needed. Without transfers, branches in rural areas might not be able to find skilled workers.
  2. career growthWorking in different places helps employees gain a wide range of experience. Many managers say that working at a regional branch taught them skills they could never have learned at the head office.
  3. fairness among staffIf some employees could simply refuse, the burden of moving would fall on everyone else. A clear rule that anyone may be transferred is fairer.

反対（No）で話すなら

I believe companies should transfer employees without their consent only to a very limited extent, if at all.

  1. dual-career couplesMost couples now both work, so a transfer can force one partner to quit or the family to live apart. This is one reason why many women give up their careers.
  2. family lifeChildren have to change schools and leave their friends, and people caring for elderly parents may be unable to move. Workers' private lives should not be decided by a company alone.
  3. changing valuesYoung people increasingly choose employers based on where they will live. Some large companies have already started letting employees refuse transfers in order to attract talent.

想定質疑面接委員はこう突っ込んでくる

QHow can companies fill positions in rural branches if employees can refuse?

Companies can offer incentives, such as higher pay or faster promotion, to people who move voluntarily. They can also hire people locally or use remote work for some tasks. I think voluntary systems work better, because motivated workers perform better.

Q：社員が断れるようになったら、地方の支店の人員はどうやって確保するのですか。
A：自分から異動する人に、給料の上乗せや早い昇進などの見返りを用意できます。地元で人を採用したり、一部の仕事をリモートで行ったりすることもできます。やる気のある人の方が良い仕事をするので、本人の希望による仕組みの方がうまくいくと思います。

QIs being transferred a good experience for young workers?

It can be. Living in a new place can broaden your perspective and help you build a network across the country. However, I think it is most valuable when the employee chooses it. A forced move may leave the person feeling stressed rather than inspired.

Q：転勤は、若い社員にとって良い経験になりますか。
A：なりえます。新しい土地で暮らすと視野が広がり、全国に人脈を作ることもできます。ただ、いちばん価値があるのは本人が選んだときだと思います。無理やりの転居では、刺激を受けるよりストレスを感じてしまうかもしれません。

QWhat should the government do about this issue?

I think the government could require companies to consider workers' family situations before ordering a transfer. It could also encourage companies to publish their transfer policies so that job seekers can make informed choices. These steps would protect workers without banning transfers completely.

Q：この問題について、政府は何をすべきですか。
A：政府は、転勤を命じる前に社員の家庭の事情を考慮するよう企業に義務づけることができると思います。また、就職を考える人がよく分かったうえで選べるよう、企業に転勤の方針を公開するよう促すこともできます。こうすれば、転勤を全面的に禁止しなくても働く人を守れます。

語彙このトピックで使える表現