Should autonomous weapons that can select and attack targets without human control be banned?

序論Thank you. I'd like to talk about whether autonomous weapons that can select and attack targets without human control should be banned. I believe they should, for three reasons: the need for human judgment, the problem of responsibility, and the danger of an arms race. 理由1First, decisions about life and death should always be made by humans. A soldier can see that a person is trying to surrender or that a child is standing nearby. An algorithm, however, only follows patterns in data. Allowing a machine to decide who lives and who dies crosses a moral line. 理由2Second, autonomous weapons create a serious problem of responsibility. If such a weapon attacks a hospital by mistake, who should be punished? The programmer, the military commander, and the manufacturer could all blame each other. Without clear responsibility, victims might never receive justice. 理由3Finally, without a ban, we will see a dangerous arms race. In recent wars, cheap drones have already changed the way battles are fought. If countries compete to make these drones fully independent, such weapons will become cheaper and more widespread, and they could easily end up in the hands of terrorists. 譲歩Admittedly, some automatic systems are needed for defense, such as those that shoot down incoming missiles. However, a ban could focus on weapons that target people, while still allowing defensive systems under human supervision. まとめIn conclusion, because life-and-death decisions require human judgment, because someone must be held responsible, and because an arms race would make the world more dangerous, I believe autonomous weapons should be banned. Thank you.