原田英語の英検二次面接 ぜんぶ攻略くん
AI採点

英検1級 二次 予想トピック 38 ・ 🏘️ 社会・地域・高齢化 ・ Agree or disagree

Agree or disagree: Loneliness should be treated as a public health issue, not just a private matter

賛成か反対か：孤独は個人の問題としてだけでなく、公衆衛生の問題として扱われるべきだ

このトピックを選ぶべき人

高齢者の一人暮らしや若者の孤立など、身近な例から社会の問題につなげて話せる人向け。

骨組み理由3つ（どちらの立場でも話せる）

賛成（Yes）で話すなら

I agree that loneliness should be treated as a public health issue.

  1. health risksResearch has linked long-term loneliness to serious health problems such as heart disease and depression. If it damages health this much, governments have good reason to act on it, just as they do with smoking.
  2. social causesLoneliness is often caused by changes in society rather than personal failure. For example, more people now live alone, and many local communities have weakened as young people move to big cities.
  3. preventionPublic action can prevent problems before they become serious. Japan and the UK have both appointed ministers responsible for loneliness, and some local governments now run community spaces where isolated people can meet.

反対（No）で話すなら

I disagree. Loneliness is a real problem, but I don't think it should be handled mainly as a public health issue.

  1. personal feelingsLoneliness is a personal feeling, and two people in the same situation may experience it very differently. It is hard for a government to measure it, let alone fix it with policy.
  2. privacyGovernment involvement in people's private lives could feel intrusive. Many older people, for instance, would not want officials checking whether they have enough friends.
  3. community roleFamilies, friends, and local groups are usually better at providing real connection than public programs. A neighborhood festival or a hobby club can do more than an official campaign.

模範スピーチ賛成の立場で2分（265語）

序論Thank you. I'd like to talk about whether loneliness should be treated as a public health issue rather than just a private matter. I agree with this idea, for three reasons: its effect on health, its social causes, and the value of prevention. 理由1First, loneliness is not just an unpleasant feeling. Research has linked long-term loneliness to serious problems such as heart disease, depression, and dementia. When something harms people's health this much, it is no longer only a personal issue. Just as governments run campaigns against smoking, they should take loneliness seriously too. 理由2Second, loneliness is often caused by changes in society, not by individual weakness. For example, more and more people in Japan live alone, and many young people have left their hometowns to work in big cities. In such a society, it is unfair to tell lonely people that the problem is their own fault. 理由3Finally, public action can stop the problem before it becomes serious. Japan now has a minister in charge of loneliness and isolation, and some local governments run community cafés where older people and students can meet. Programs like these cost far less than treating illness later. 譲歩Of course, some people argue that the government should not interfere in people's private lives. That's a fair concern. However, treating loneliness as a public issue does not mean forcing anyone to make friends. It simply means creating more chances for people to connect. まとめIn conclusion, because loneliness harms health, is shaped by society, and can be prevented, I believe it should be treated as a public health issue. Thank you.

和訳

ありがとうございます。孤独は個人の問題としてだけでなく、公衆衛生の問題として扱われるべきかについてお話しします。私はこの考えに賛成です。理由は3つ、健康への影響、社会的な原因、そして予防の価値です。 まず、孤独は単なる嫌な気分ではありません。研究では、長く続く孤独が心臓病やうつ病、認知症といった深刻な問題と関連づけられています。これほど健康を害するものは、もはや個人だけの問題ではありません。政府が禁煙キャンペーンを行うのと同じように、孤独にも真剣に取り組むべきです。 次に、孤独は個人の弱さではなく、社会の変化によって生じることが多いのです。例えば日本では一人暮らしの人が増え続け、多くの若者が働くために故郷を離れて大都市へ移っています。そうした社会で、孤独な人に「あなた自身のせいだ」と言うのは不公平です。 最後に、公的な取り組みは問題が深刻になる前に食い止められます。日本には今、孤独・孤立対策を担当する大臣がいて、高齢者と学生が交流できる地域のカフェを運営する自治体もあります。こうした取り組みは、後で病気を治療するよりずっと安く済みます。 もちろん、政府は人々の私生活に干渉すべきではないと主張する人もいます。もっともな懸念です。しかし、孤独を公の問題として扱うことは、誰かに友達を作るよう強制することではありません。人がつながる機会を増やすというだけのことです。 結論として、孤独は健康を害し、社会によって形づくられ、予防できるものなので、公衆衛生の問題として扱われるべきだと考えます。ありがとうございました。

想定質疑面接委員はこう突っ込んでくる

QHow would you measure whether such policies are working?

That's a difficult question. Loneliness is hard to measure directly, but governments can carry out regular surveys asking people how often they feel isolated. They can also track how many people use community services. Even if the data is not perfect, it can show whether things are moving in the right direction.

Q：そうした政策が効果を上げているかをどう測りますか。
A：難しい質問です。孤独を直接測るのは難しいですが、どのくらい孤立を感じるかを尋ねる調査を定期的に行うことはできます。地域のサービスを利用する人の数を追うこともできます。データが完璧でなくても、良い方向に進んでいるかどうかは分かります。

QIsn't social media making people less lonely, since it keeps them connected?

I see what you mean. Social media can certainly help people stay in touch with distant friends. However, online contact often cannot replace meeting someone face to face, and heavy use may even increase feelings of isolation. So I still think real-world connections need public support.

Q：SNSで人はつながっているので、孤独は減っているのでは？
A：おっしゃることは分かります。SNSは遠くの友人との連絡を保つのに確かに役立ちます。しかし、オンラインのやり取りは直接会うことの代わりにならないことが多く、使いすぎるとかえって孤立感が強まることもあります。ですから、やはり現実のつながりには公的な支援が必要だと考えます。

QWho should pay for these programs?

I think the cost should be shared between the national and local governments. Local governments know their communities best, so they should run the programs, while the national government provides funding. In the long run, this could even save money by reducing medical costs.

Q：その費用は誰が払うべきですか。
A：国と自治体で分担すべきだと思います。地域のことを最もよく知っているのは自治体なので、取り組みの運営は自治体が行い、国が資金を出すのがよいでしょう。長い目で見れば、医療費が減ることでむしろ節約になるかもしれません。

語彙このトピックで使える表現